... LATEST FEATURES

Introduction & Summary

Historical Developments

LVPM OUTPUTS

Origins & Confirmation

TPM

LVPM

Dual Formation Model

LAMINAE I

bed thickness effects

density, neutron plots

LAMINAE II

VUGS I

VUGS II

VUGS III

FRACTALS

PDFs with large FDs

PDFs with small FDs

LVPM Results

References

NEUTRON SOURCE EFFECTS

DEVELOPMENTS

NON-PROLIFERATION

IMPROVED GENERATOR POROSITY MEASUREMENTS

About...

Resume

Published Papers

Stuff & Things

 
 
DENSITY, NEUTRON & PULSED NEUTRON
MEASUREMENTS IN LAMINAE, PART II


In this second example of laminated beds, LVPM was used to
model limestone laminae whose pores alternately contain oil
and then montmorillonite. The oil + limestone pore size was
fixed at 0.0001 cm and the montmorillonite + limestone pore
size was fixed at a much larger value of 0.1 cm. Significant
differences appear between the parallel and perpendicular
laminar orientations.

The bed thicknesses of both types of laminae were varied from
0.01 cm to 10 cm. In the figures of this section, the far
left always refers to mainly montmorillonite saturated
limestone and the far right refers to mainly oil saturated
limestone. Specifically, from left to center, the limestone
+ montmorillonite bed thickness is fixed at 10 cm. Then,
from center to right, this bed thickness drops from 10 cm to
0.01 cm. For the limestone and oil, its bed thickness varies
from 0.01 cm to 10 cm from left to center and then from center
to right, it is fixed at 10 cm. Thus, at the center of all
these figures, both bed thicknesses are equal to 10 cm.

Again in this section, homogeneous refers to the application
of classic volumetric mixing rules governed by bed thickness
weighting for homogeneous media with infinitesimal pore sizes.
Heterogeneous again refers to the exclusive use of the
transmission probability method within LVPM to compute all
physical properties for both media with finite limestone pore
sizes. LVPM more accurately details the propagation of
neutrons and gamma rays in these heterogeneous media.
Corrections need to be applied to the apparent density and
neutron logging values to properly account for finite pore
sizes and bed thickness effects.


Document
Review of Bed Thickness Weighting for Laminated Beds
Document
Example Specification and Discussion of Results
Document
FIG 1: BULK DENSITY vs Bed Thickness
Document
FIG 2: DENSITY POROSITY vs Bed Thickness
Document
FIG 3: NEUTRON POROSITY vs Bed Thickness
 

 

In Figure 1, note that the homogeneous/classic bulk densities
and the LVPM parallel orientation bulk densities are about the
same whereas the LVPM perpendicular orientation bulk densities
are much lower, by an average of 0.047 g/cc, than the other two.
In this example, bulk density log readings in perpendicular and
parallel laminated beds need to be increased to correct for the
propagation of gamma rays in these laminae.  For the parallel
laminae these increases are equal to those expected from
classic bed thickness weighting.  However, for the perpendicular
lamine, such corrections are much larger.

Increases in LVPM neutron porosity in laminated beds are
observed in Figure 3 as the oil and limestone bed thickness
increases; these increases continue as the montmorillonite
and limestone bed thickness is reduced.   These porosity values
are derived from a proxy model based on the neutron slowing
down length (Figure 6).  In this example, LVPM neutron
porosities for both the parallel and perpendicular cases are
about the same and  both are larger than those predicted from
classic bed thickness weighting.  These overly optimistic
neutron porosity values must be decreased to improve porosity
measurement accuracy.


Document
FIG 4: THERMAL NEUTRON DIFFUSION LENGTH vs Bed Thickness
Document
FIG 5: THERMAL NEUTRON DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT vs Bed Thickness
Document
FIG 6: SLOWING DOWN LENGTH vs Bed Thickness

Web Hosting powered by Network Solutions®

 
 
 

Doctor Neutron

! Gamma Rays Too !